Canada Free Press -- ARCHIVES

Because without America, there is no free world.

Return to Canada Free Press

Silvestre Reyes, terrorism, terrorists

House Intel Chairman: Hezbollah? What's a Hezbollah?

By Jim Kouri

Friday, December 15, 2006

Law enforcement and intelligence experts are scratching their heads in disbelief upon discovering that the next House Intelligence Committee Chairman doesn't possess even a basic understanding of terrorism or terrorist groups. In fact, he's never heard of Hezbollah.

Representative Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), who was Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi's second choice to head the sensitive and vital committee, did not know what Hezbollah was and incorrectly described al-Qaeda as being Shiite rather than Sunni.

Rep. Reyes appeared disoriented when a reporter asked him basic questions about the Islamic groups that are the principal targets of america's intelligence agencies, including al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah and others.

"al-Qa'eda is what – Sunni or Shia?" Jeff Stein, the Congressional Quarterly magazine's national security editor, asked Mr Reyes. "al-Qaeda, they have both," replied Reyes.

"You're talking about predominately?"Predominantly – probably Shiite," said the puzzled Democrat from Texas.

as Mr. Stein noted in his CQ column, "He couldn't have been more wrong. al-Qaeda is profoundly Sunni. If a Shiite showed up at an al-Qaeda club house, they'd slice off his head and use it for a soccer ball."

He also asked Reyes about the terrorist group Hezbollah. "Hezbollah. Uh, Hezbollah..." he said, laughing. "Why do you ask me these questions at five o'clock? Can I answer in Spanish? Do you speak Spanish?"

"This is no laughing matter. Where was this man when Israel and Hezbollah battled for almost two weeks?" asked a former intelligence officer and now New York City detective.

"We went from an impeached judge to a man ignorant of the basic facts regarding terrorist groups. What kind of oversight will that be?" he added.

The holes in Reyes' knowledge are a fresh embarrassment to Nancy Pelosi, the incoming Speaker of the House of Representatives, whose leadership was undermined when her first choice for House Majority Leader was rejected and her choice for intelligence chairman was likewise rejected.

She selected Rep. Reyes to chair the House intelligence committee over the head of Jane Harman (D-Ca), who is widely respected as having vast experience in the area of intelligence gathering and analysis especially in the Middle East. Pelosi and the left-wing of the Democrat Party bear a grudge against Miss Harman due to her politically moderate image.

"What are we being left with in congress? a chairman of the House Judiciary Committee who hates cops and panders to america's enemies? a Senate Judiciary Committee chairman with a history of leaking classified information? a hard-left senator heading the Senate Intelligence Committee? and now a House Intelligence Committee chairman who doesn't know what Hezbollah is?," asked a police terrorism expert.

"Sounds like amateur hour to me," he said.

While Reyes was preferred over Rep. alcee Hastings -- who was removed from the federal bench after facing bribery charges -- for the intel post, most americans aren't being told by the Democrats and their media echo chamber that Hastings remains a ranking member of the House Sub-Committee on Homeland Security.

When counterterrorism mavin Richard Clark was hawking his book and testifying before the 9/11 Commission, he took time out to appear on CBS' 60 Minutes. Clark alleged that then-National Security advisor Condoleeza Rice didn't know what a-Qaeda was (which was an obvious lie). The news media jumped on Clark's accusation and repeated it ad nauseum.

But now a Democrat in an equally sensitive position has been exposed as ignorant of facts regarding terrorist groups, and it looks as if he'll be getting the standard "pass" by those "unbiased" ladies and gentlemen of the press.


Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2024 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2024 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement