Canada Free Press -- ARCHIVES

Because without America, there is no free world.

Return to Canada Free Press

Censoring the Internet, China, European Union, Congress

Net Neutrality

by Nathan Tabor
Tuesday, May 23, 2006

China does it. The European Union is trying to do it, and there are increasing concerns that the U.S. government might one day try to do it. "It" is regulating, and possibly censoring the Internet. So far, lawmakers have been reluctant to replace the flexible, market-driven success story with a system of intrusive regulation, but the House is now considering a bill that would make it illegal to access networking sites such as MySpace.com from a school or library. The website, which has been linked to alleged instances of adult sexual predators trolling for naïve minors, has caused concern among legislators who are rushing to what could be a very slippery slope.

For the sake of argument, what if Congress managed to shut down MySpace.com? What would be next and when would the censorship or wave of more and more regulations ever end? Can you imagine a political party in power deciding that blogs supporting the other sides' positions merited closer scrutiny?

If you've never considered the possibility that the federal government might one day tell you what websites you could access, what files you could download, and even what software packages you could install on your computer, it might be time to take a look at "Hands Off the Internet," a site representing a coalition of Internet users who have taken a proactive stance on maintaining "Net Neutrality." Their logo of "Say NO to Government Regulation of the Internet" is complimented with pages of links to articles which further address the subject, a news section, two form letters to contact your legislators to voice your concerns about possible government interference of the Internet, and a chance to sign-up for site updates and further legislative movement as it develops.

Stop by handsoff.org while Congress is preoccupied with illegal immigrants. Who knows what's next on their agenda?


Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement