Now Mobile-Friendly
Home | RSS Feeds | CFP Store | Photo Gallery | Archives | About Us | Advertise | Subscribe | Letters | Submissions | Links |Facebook | Twitter | Gas Prices
Custom Search
Countdown until Obama leaves Office




Donatello Restaurant Fine Italian and Mediterranean Dining in Toronto.








Blatant form of voter intimidation, New Black Panther Party

Radicalism Running Amuck: Black Panthers in, Returning Vets Out!

Author
- John Lillpop  Friday, May 29, 2009
(2) Comments | Print friendly | Email Us

In the new Obama paradigm for justice, the Department of Homeland Security warns that returning veterans, those who oppose illegal immigration, higher taxes, uncontrolled spending, gun control, and infanticide are “right wing extremists,” scoundrels of the sort that government has an obligation to keep a wary eye on.

Conversely, intimidating voters with violence on Election Day appears to be acceptable, provided the intimidator is black and an Obama supporter.

As reported by the Washington Times, in part:

“Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for self-defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.

“The incident - which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube - had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.

“Career lawyers pursued the case for months, including obtaining an affidavit from a prominent 1960s civil rights activist who witnessed the confrontation and described it as “the most blatant form of voter intimidation” that he had seen, even during the voting rights crisis in Mississippi a half-century ago.

“The lawyers also had ascertained that one of the three men had gained access to the polling place by securing a credential as a Democratic poll watcher, according to interviews and documents reviewed by The Washington Times.

The career Justice lawyers were on the verge of securing sanctions against the men earlier this month when their superiors ordered them to reverse course, according to interviews and documents. The court had already entered a default judgment against the men on April 20.”

“Blatant form of voter intimidation?” How can that possibly be, given the fact that people of color are genetically incapable of racism and discrimination?

If any good comes from this outrageous behavior, perhaps it will be in the form of an urgent message to all decent and honorable Americans:

We the People must acknowledge that our government, starting with the president, no longer respects the values and freedoms that this nation were founded on and which make America special.

Be afraid—very afraid!

John Lillpop
Most recent columns


John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal. “Clean and sober” since 1992 when last he voted for a Democrat. Pray for John: He lives in the San Francisco Bay Area, where people like Nancy Pelosi are actually considered normal!.

John can be reached at: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Older articles by John Lillpop


Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2012 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2012 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement
Travel America
Canada Free Press Store
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2012 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2012 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement