We all are involved today in the political turmoil that is, and has been taking place in our country for awhile now. We see our government growing at an unprecedented rate and in doing so we also see our freedoms of expression continuing to be less and less through political correctness.
We see our elected officials becoming more and more brazen in their arrogance towards the American people of "not being able to think for themselves," and if we're not very careful, it will be soon be reaching the point of total control.
Let's "drill baby drill," has been reneged on by our government, and according to numerous reports
we have vast amounts of oil and natural gas, yet through government regulation, the EPA, and other environmentalist groups, we're denied the use of our own resources. On top of this, just consider the number of jobs, good jobs that these endeavors would create for...Americans. That is unless of course we fill the crews with "illegal's," would that shock anybody?
Yet our dependency on oil is actually controlled by peoples of the "religion of peace," to a large part. By the way, this is the same "peace" that declares non-believers as infidels, and condones the killings of anyone who doesn't adhere to the faith, right down to other Muslims, even their own families. We literally pump billions upon billions of our money to these very same people. Is this in itself funding our own demise? You already know the answer.
When is...Enough...Enough?
Just recently Congressman Keith Ellison D-Minnesota,
declared, "I think that we need to create a real crisis here so that the Republicans will have to answer for denying Americans unemployment benefits on the eve of the Christmas holiday...we let them off the hook in my opinion."
Quickly let's take a look at who
Ellison is.
Born in 1963 and raised in Detroit, Michigan as a Roman Catholic, he
converted to Islam at age 19, and after being elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 2006, becoming the first Muslim to do so, he placed his right hand on the Quran at the photo-op reenactment of his congressional swearing-in ceremony.
As a third year-law student at the University of Minnesota, in 1989-90, Ellison penned two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name of "Keith Hakim." In the first he made respectful reference to "Minister Louis Farrakhan" and indicated by his tone that he was an avid Nation of Islam (NOI) advocate. Ellis also defended NOI spokesman and black supremacist Khalid Abdul Muhammad.
In the second piece, Ellison demanded reparations for slavery and said
that African Americans should be offered the option of settling in an all black, geographically self-contained, separate "homeland" if they wished." In Feb. 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (a.k.a. Stokely Carmichael) to speak at his law school on the subject of, "
Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?"
In 2006, Ellison sent a letter to the local chapter of the Jewish Community Relations Council, addressing his Nation of Islam links. In the letter Ellison asserted his involvement with the NOI had been limited to an 18 month stint,
and in fact during this time, he had been unfamiliar with the NOI's anti-Semitic views! Who else in your opinion has stated basically the exact same ignorance in regards to blatant, hate inspiring, racially motivated rhetoric? How about our President in regards to his Pastor of nearly 20 years, Reverend Jeremiah Wright?
Ellison most recently was elected co-chair of the Progressive caucus in the House. Boy, those "progressives," they're so....so American in their beliefs, aren't they?? Had enough yet?
Please use the link provided above and read the entire profile it is eye-opening to say the least.
Speaking of our President
Just recently President Obama expressed his opinion in regards to the extension of the Bush tax cuts by saying, "It's tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers, unless the hostage gets harmed...The hostage was the American people."
In regards to that statement let's look at the Stimulus package. The majority of the people, and top economists were clearly stating, "Don't do it." What happened? Quite frankly, I feel the position taken by the administration in passing this legislation was indeed hostage taking. Unemployment was not to exceed 8%, and millions of "shovel ready" jobs were waiting to be created, but this was not the case...unemployment hovering around the 10% mark, not counting the unemployed whose benefits have expired, and the "shovel ready" jobs were a figment of someone's imagination, they were never there, and worse still is the fact,
they were never even expected to be. Oh, but the unions, government programs, and the government itself reaped the rewards from our tax dollars.
Obama-care is but one other example of legislation being shoved down our throats, though a federal judge in Virginia ruled yesterday it is unconstitutional. But yes, when our President speaks on the issue of hostage taking though, I do feel he is in fact very knowledgeable on this particular subject, but way off base in the example he's using in regard to taxation.
To read an entirely different take on President Obama's "hostage takers" comments read this excerpt from "The Party For Socialism and Liberation"
We say it is time for workers to stop being hostages of the system, and to start "taking hostages" instead. In country after country, workers and students have begun to fight back and exercise their real power in society with strikes and shutdowns. We need that here. The banks take the system hostage by withholding capital. We can take it hostage by withholding labor. Their capital strikes can be met powerfully with labor strikes. [url=http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=14861&news_iv_ctrl=1261]http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=14861&news_iv_ctrl=1261[/url]
Another topic that literally came as a shock to me in regards to President Obama, was during the campaign, and I think after the election also, the advocating by the schools, of children, small children mind you, singing praises to our newly elected Commander-in-Chief. Even more shocking to me, was the number of parents allowing this to happen as well! Never in my entire life, 54 years worth, had I ever witnessed anything like this. Those happenings were unbelievable to me, and really started my questioning of where in fact was our country headed? Just take a look at a couple of these again. (
Video 1 and
Video 2)
Could you, if not for the language, mistake this for being the children of China, the old USSR, N. Korea, or any Communist country for that matter? On top of that, as badly as I hate to make this statement, even Nazi Germany with the Hitler Youth? This is terrible to say, but I believe these statements to be valid in regards to the subject.
In Feb. of 2008, Louis Farrakhan called Obama, "A herald of the messiah." "Barack has captured the youth,"" referring to the passionate support Obama has drawn from young people in America. "And he has involved young people in a political process they didn't care anything about. That's a sign. When the messiah speaks, the youth will hear.
And the messiah is absolutely speaking."
Obama was a junior Senator, for God's sake, a community organizer for most of his adult life. What warrants this type of adulation, besides a type of indoctrination? After all, our schools have been infiltrated and pretty much taken over in regards to the subject matter they teach by the far left for years now. Look no further than our mainstream news media as well... Had enough yet?
The United Nations
The U.N.'s Economic, Social and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),
released a 98 page report offering a universal lesson plan for kids, ranging in age from 5-18 (June 26, 2009). This being, in their opinion, "an informed approach to effective sex, and relationships" along with HIV education, all of which they claim to be essential for "all young people."
The UNESCO report, the "International Guidelines for Sexuality Education," separates the children into four age groups: 5 to 8 year-olds, 9 to 12 year-olds, 12 to 15 year olds, and 15 to 18 year-olds.
Under the U.N. guidelines, kids only 5-8 year-olds would be taught that "touching and rubbing one's genitals is called masturbation" and that private parts "can feel pleasurable when touched by oneself."
Maybe I've become an "old fogey" but I am not comfortable at all with this being taught to children in this age bracket, much less without parental consent. I feel strongly also, that this is a job for a family member to discuss with the children, my opinion. I just cannot be led to believe this is beneficial in regards to children of this age group.
Ages 9-12 will be exposed to the "positive and negative effects of aphrodisiacs." Somebody please explain for me the reasoning a 9-12 year old needs to know anything at all about aphrodisiacs much less the effects of them? Do you not see the dangers in our schools today from these so-called academics? These people are warped, aren't they?
On top of this the 9-12 year-olds will get to "wrestle" with the ideas of homophobia, transphobia, and the abuse of power. Now there's something I know about, the abuse of power. This is in essence what our politicians have been prescribing to "we the people" for decades, but has become much more widespread with the election of our current administration.
In regards to transphobia, here's the definition, okay I admit it...I had to look it up!
Transphobia, or
trans-misandry, refers to discrimination against transsexualism and transsexual or transgender people, based on the expression of their internal gender identity.
I'm 54 and honestly I didn't know what the word meant... then after seeing the definition of transphobia, what could 9-12 year old children possibly have the need for understanding this word? This is outrageous.
At 15, they'll be exposed to the direct "advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion." Do you remember when you were 15 years old? I do, and I can tell you I was in no way "intellectually bright" enough to make any type of rational decision on this subject. Had enough yet?
The Inequality shown by Our Government Today in regards Towards People of Color"
In the regards to people of color or racism, I was under the impression this was a subject that had become less and less of an issue in its pertinence in America today. I hardly ever heard harsh rhetoric from any race directed at anyone anymore. Sure there were a few examples of people who made racial remarks or slurs, but in all honesty, these types of rhetoric were almost non-existent. No matter what, there will always be a few.
Then along came our last Presidential election and Barack Obama. This changed it all once more. Instead of the white racism, that had been overcome by the teachings of Dr. Martin Luther King, and the white race itself understanding the wrongs that had occurred in times past, this time the "can of worms" was opened by the people of color and the far-left. This not being done as an undercurrent of small talk, but instantly it became a topic of hateful racism, despising America, vile accusations, most of which were completely off base, and still are by the way.
My not voting for Obama had no bearing at all of the man being, half-black, not all black as the left and the people of color seem to forget. No, no though, according to the far-left and friends, my vote was not cast in his favor simply because my being racist, I wouldn't vote for the black man. Simply, in reality Obama didn't get my vote on account of his far-left views and wanting to re-distribute our wealth.
These people are complete nuts and condone bullying, and even terrorism from the standpoint of using scare tactics and intimidation. Andrew Stern of the SEIU stated very clearly, "We believe in the power of persuasion, but if that doesn't work we then believe in the persuasion of power."
Remember the Greg Baer story. Baer was deputy general counsel for corporate law at Bank of America. His was the home the SEI, and a Chicago outfit called National Political Action, stormed 500 strong, screaming and waving signs outside his residence. Actually they were just barely outside his home. Let me insert quickly though, who do we know comes from Chicago, and actually worked, via community organizing, for groups such as this "outfit from Chicago?" Oh yeah...President Obama, that's right.
If you remember the whole story Baer's teenage son was home alone at the time and had locked himself in the bathroom. Do you suppose this child was frightened to say the least? These truly are despicable actions!
How were these people transported to Baer's home?
School busses, of all things! The police were called and didn't respond with the excuse they didn't want to "incite" the trespassers. Why didn't the police consider dispersing the protesters with the loud, and distinctly impressionable sound of a round being chambered into a 12 gauge shotgun. I would imagine the child inside was assuredly in fear of his own life, wouldn't you? How would you respond to an angry mob of 500 trespassers on your lawn...with your children inside? Think about it. Had enough?
To read this article:
money.cnn.com
Lastly, I wish you all will take the time and watch this next
video. I think this will show you first hand the "social justice," and inequality of our government dealing with people of color that we've been talking about. It is Obama Economic Advisor Robert Reich along with Congressman Charles Rangel, on Jan. 7, 2009, talking about the spending of the Stimulus money. Listen closely, it will hammer home every point that I've tried to make. It is a little over three minutes long, but paints a very clear picture of their political agenda! The rhetoric here by these two guys is literally appalling. Check it out, please, and let me know if in fact you have... Had enough!
Thank you all for your time, and God Bless!
