Now Mobile-Friendly
Home | RSS Feeds | CFP Store | Photo Gallery | Archives | About Us | Advertise | Subscribe | Letters | Submissions | Links |Facebook | Twitter | Gas Prices
Custom Search
Countdown until Obama leaves Office

Donatello Restaurant Fine Italian and Mediterranean Dining in Toronto.


Obama was never challenged by anyone in the Congress, by any prominent Democrat or Republican or by the main stream media

Obama’s ineligibility: Beyond arrogance and ignorance

Author
- Lawrence Sellin  Thursday, April 14, 2011
(41) Comments | Print friendly | Email Us

The time has long past for the American people to demand honest and unequivocal answers from our leaders.

The Constitution stipulates that only a “natural born citizen” can be President i.e. someone born in the US of citizen parents at the time of birth.

According to that definition, Barack Hussein Obama, whose father was Kenyan, has never been eligible.

Every US President at the time of his election or assumption to power was either proven to be or believed to be a natural born citizen.

Even Senator John McCain, during the 2008 Presidential campaign, was obliged to release his long-form birth certificate. His eligibility was subjected to public scrutiny and a Senate resolution was passed as a confirmation that he met the requirements of natural born citizenship.

It has always been known that Obama did not meet the same requirements. Yet he was never challenged by anyone in the Congress, by any prominent Democrat or Republican or by the main stream media.

Why was Obama exempt from even the most rudimentary examination of his credentials for office? And why are these same people denying that the Constitution has been violated? And why are they trying to bury the issue and denouncing anyone who speaks of it?

Have they all decided that the term natural born citizen no longer applies as a prerequisite for the Presidency? If so, what are the new criteria for eligibility?

The American people are waiting for the truth, not just the usual displays of elitist arrogance or feigned ignorance. There is clearly a conspiracy of silence. Is there also ethical or criminal liability?

It is no accident that Donald Trump has catapulted in the polls. The American people are rewarding him for having the courage to ask a question that is considered heresy by the ruling class. And how do these effete elites respond? With cries of racism and lunacy, the last resort of scoundrels.

The Declaration of Independence states:

“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. ... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion; what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?”

The ruling class is afraid, very afraid, and they should be. Complicity or acquiescence in potentially the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American people would bring down, like a house of cards, a gaggle of dishonest politicians and sleazy journalists.

One can only hope that the truth will prevail and the Constitution will be preserved. It may be time for the people to utter a new declaration of independence and usher in an American Renaissance.

Like Lexington and Concord, it is time to stand our ground.




Lawrence Sellin
Most recent columns


© Canada Free Press 2011

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a recently retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve. He is a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. receives hate mail at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Surviving Times of Trouble...

An Every Day Online Almanac to See You Through Disaster Natural or Otherwise
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2012 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2012 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement