When I was 12 years old, I used to play tennis at a certain public park in the Bronx. One day it got back to me that a black fellow at the courts, whose name I forget, said “Selwyn doesn’t like black people.” This raised my eyebrows. You see, I had never really thought about the man one way or the other. And what occupied my mind were forehands, backhands, topspin and volleys, not race. So the only thing I could figure was that I was probably in a funk one day and didn’t hear and acknowledge a greeting he might have extended.
After Hurricane Katrina, Louis Farrakhan
claimed that the breached levees had been blown-up by the government; Spike Lee said that his theory wasn’t “far-fetched”; and even before Looney Louie had weighed in, black residents on the street stated that the flooding was part of a conspiracy to rid New Orleans of black people. On a more frivolous but equally ridiculous note, I’ve heard black golf fans claim that the late-1990s equipment revolution that enabled players to hit the ball further, and the subsequent lengthening of golf courses, were engineered for the purposes of undermining Tiger Woods, a black man dominating a white game. Of course, given what we now know about Woods’ extra-curricular activities, targeting him with HIV might have been easier.
To illustrate the phenomenon causing people to believe such inanity, consider a woman in a bad marriage who hates her husband. She may see him through colored glasses, and then his trespasses are never innocent mistakes, are they? Instead, much that he does will displease her--and all of it is part of an effort to upset her. "Why, that's just the kind of thing he
would do!" thinks she. Now, don't get me wrong. He may be lacking or even a cad, and he may sometimes actually try to get her goat. But that isn't the point. It is, rather, that whatever he is or isn't, she won't perceive it clearly through those colored glasses. Hatred is like darkness: the more there is, the less you can see.
And this is precisely the issue in the black community. Black minister and head of the Brotherhood Organization for a New Destiny Jesse Lee Peterson alluded to this when he said that the goal of racial hustlers such as Jesse Jackson is to keep black people angry so that they won't be able to think clearly. Yet this "Jacksonizing" of youth is now endemic in the black community. Too many black children are weaned on ideas such as "The white man is keeping you down," "The white man has oppressed you" and "A black man has no place in America." They may hear such sentiments from their parents, from Reverend Wrights in churches, from friends, from music and popular culture--and even in school (read
here). The result is that they view whites through colored glasses, seeing bad intentions and Caucasian conspiracies where none exist. Hey, that's just the way white people are.
Of course, this phenomenon isn't unique to black/white relations. It's evident in Palestinian/Jewish ones, Hutu/Tutsi ones, Turkish/Armenian ones and many others as well; it's something that has ever plagued man. And because it has such a long history and can be easily understood, something can be said with confidence: black grievance will never end.
Oh, "never" is a long time?
I'll be more precise: the American republic will end before black grievance will.
To place this in further perspective, consider jihadist teaching. Would you expect the next generation of Muslims to relinquish their grievances against Jews when anti-Semitism is taught in tens of thousands of madrassahs worldwide and presented as part of Islamic religion? Well, consider that anti-white teaching is rife in the black community and has been molded into a religion; it's
called Black Liberation Theology (BLT) and teaches that God must assist in eradicating "the white enemy." Then there is Critical Race Theory (CRT)--an offshoot of Marxist critical theory--which states that "the [American] system must be made
unequal in order to compensate for the innate racism of the white majority,"
writes Ben Shapiro. And don't argue about it, either. Many BLT and CRT adherents will tell you that white people are blind to their inherent bigotry and that "white privilege" renders them oblivious to their "undeserved" benefits, so only non-whites can grasp their dysfunction.
To make matters worse, in the way that Islam is on the march as radicalism takes hold in ever more mosques, black grievance only gets worse, ironically, as we move further from the antebellum period. Why? Well, just as 18
th-century Muslims knew nothing of the Crusades (which were
a response to Islamic aggression) until taught about them in 19
th-century English and French colonial schools, the teaching of black children is not what it was back when the three
Rs weren't racism, radicalism and revenge. Note that BLT was only originated in 1966 and CRT in the late 1970s.
And this again speaks to the intractability of black grievance. "As the twig is bent, so grows the tree," the saying goes; it's hard to overcome what is instilled during formative years. And anger has its appeal. As a black woman caller emphatically stated on a radio talk show I listened to some years ago, "My hate keeps me going!" Yes, passion is energizing and can be born of hate as well as love. And in keeping with Ben Franklin's saying, "You cannot reason a man out of a position he has not reasoned himself into," problems of misguided emotion cannot be remedied with intellectual appeals. Whatever whites are or are not, it won't be perceived clearly until the colored glasses come off.
And how are they removed? Whether you're black, white, a Palestinian or that hypothetical wife, the answer is always the same: forgiveness. When we forgive, the blinding anger dissipates and we finally see the object of our wrath clearly. Then we often learn that he isn't quite the monster we once imagined.
Unless this were to happen, we shouldn't expect anything but what we have already witnessed: Attorney General Eric Holder's refusal to prosecute the Philadelphia Black Panthers, Barack Obama's stoking of racial anger, blacks' assumption that every Trayvon Martin is an innocent victim, and
increasing "retaliatory" attacks on whites by the children of BLT and CRT. And we shouldn't be naïve enough to think that pandering helps. You're not going to prove your good will to Jackson, Holder, Al Sharpton and their fellow travelers by offering handouts, government programs and quotas. You won't prove it by voting for a (half) black president, which--especially when he is a BLT Marxist radical--is seen just as license to extract more pounds of flesh. You won't soothe their savage breasts by taking it on the chin and then saying, "Thank you, sir; may I have another?" For the Jeremiah Wrights of the world are much like the
Independence Day alien who
was asked by the American president, "What is it you want us to do?"
His answer: "die."
Only, because BLT babies can't yet access the firepower of Louis Farrakhan's
earth-orbiting mother ship, "which will reign down destruction on white America," they're not quite so forthcoming.
As for whites, if our concessions won't help, what can we do? Well, while we shouldn't respond to hate with hate or think being on its receiving end absolves us of the obligation to act morally, we could be more forthcoming ourselves. We can start by following Eric Holder's words, as opposed to his deeds, and cease being cowards on race. This would mean telling black Americans the truth: their problems lie not in their stars--white or otherwise--but in themselves.
