Divide and Conquer – The Life and Slimes of the Lying King!

Conservatives owe Hillary Rosen a big ‘thank you’ for revealing how her boss, the Lying King, despises stay-at-home mothers. As deliberate as this regime is in advancing its unholy agenda, you realize that the confederate masterminds within the White House crafted Ms. Rosen’s remarks in an effort to isolate Ann Romney as an out-of-touch, rich _itch.

Once an agitator, always an agitator! The lone talents the Lying King developed during his days of representing ACORN are the abilities of blackmailing ‘enemies’ and dividing to conquer. Fortunately, his attack upon stay-at-home and wishful stay-at-home women has not had the desired effect. What threats are stay-at-home mothers to the Lying King and his confederacy?

• Could it be that many of these mothers have strong Christian or Jewish morals, ethics and principals?
• Could it be that they and their husbands have decided that taking care of their children in their formative years is worth temporarily sacrificing an income and a career to do so?
• Could it be that these women have waived their ‘right’ to an abortion to welcome a child into this world?
• Could it be that some stay-at-home women may have the audacity to teach their children at home, sheltering their children from the Progressive indoctrination pushed upon students within many of the public schools?

---

Or could it be that while Press Secretary Carney was saying that the Lying King has been focused upon conducting the business of his office because he did not have to endure a primary, the Lying King has really been looking at the polls, and he realizes that because he finally has a record, people distrust and detest him?

The ark of Progressive perdition covenant has been opened, and the contents are ghoulishly ghastly! The ‘trick-or-treat’ of the Obama regime has been all trick, and no treat! Hopefully, all women and men across America will wake up to the fact that this imposter-of-a-leader is nothing more than the Chicago political thug he truly is. If you disagree with him on any issue, a target has been imposed upon you. It is time to realize that behind the manufactured, calm exterior of the Lying King lurks the evil of a serial user and abuser. As always, we can expect the Lying King to dump Ms. Rosen like yesterday’s dirty laundry as he, the sirens within his regime, and the Goebbels media regroup for attacks that are more focused, more personal and more brutal. I rarely listen to the Conservative vs. Progressive shouting matches on Sean Hannity’s Show, but I did listen to the spirited, yet stupid, comments of Tamara Holder in her naked attempt to attack Mitt and Ann Romney by defending Ms. Rosen. Ms. Holder was aghast that Mitt Romney would promote his wife an expert on the economy. Mr. Romney never promoted his wife as expert on the economy, but when a person is desperate, rarely does he/she let facts get in his/her way of pushing his/her agenda. As for working, I’ll wager that Ann Romney has worked more diligently in raising her five children than the First Lady has in attempting to instill the Lying King’s and her arrogance and entitlement mindsets into their daughters. Would Ms. Holder take a similar position in attacking the Lying King for consulting Michelle on any issue? Sarcastically speaking, you don’t need to be a meteorologist to see that a tornado is bearing down upon you, and we have an F-5 financial tornado that is bearing down upon our republic. If we are such an advanced society, why do so many women feel compelled to work outside of the home? Shouldn’t it be a woman’s or a couple’s choice for a woman to decide if she stays at home, or works outside of the home? If a domineering government extracted less from workers’ incomes by the way of taxes at the local, state and federal levels to pay for the lifetime lotteries so many government jobs offer so many non-productive, entitlement-minded employees, could more women have a choice of staying at home? How many of these stay-at-home women volunteer for projects at their children’s school(s), and at non-profit enterprises? Will this circumstance be a consideration when a woman has a health issue when determining if she will receive care under DictatorCare, especially if she is not generating an income for a dependent? Isn’t this attack upon stay-at-home women just another attempt to foment a new beachhead of class envy to further divide and conquer the American voting public? My mother grew up with three sisters during the Depression in a rural, railroad town in East-Central Kansas. Their father worked at a small bank during the Depression, so you know they were not born with silver spoons in their mouths. All four sisters were very intelligent and independent. They were encouraged to excel at whatever they did, and each did excel in her own way. My mother worked and earned scholarships along the way to earning a Master’s Degree during an era when a college education was more of a rarity for women. Following the Japanese attack upon Pearl Harbor, and losing a cousin on the Arizona, she volunteered for the U. S. Army, serving as a dietician on Saipan during WWII. She was not a passive woman! I am the oldest of seven children. Our mother and father opted to sacrifice a second income and the prestige my mother would have surely enjoyed as a registered dietician, to ensure that we enjoyed the benefits of a stay-at-home mother looking after us. Just raising me was a fulltime job, let alone adding six to the mix. Additionally, my mom was depended upon by working mothers in our neighborhood to look after their children while those mothers were at work. To my knowledge, my mom was never paid for the expanded responsibility of looking after the children of the gainfully employed women, but she did it anyway. At the time, I didn’t understand or appreciate how fortunate my siblings and I were to have our mom at home throughout the day, but I cherish the memories of those days. I realize the decision and sacrifices my parents made to keep my mother at home may not be available to many women today, especially with our government-induced, moribund economy, but shouldn’t that option be available to discerning women of every generation? The Lying King ran for office of the Presidency as the post-racial, post-divisive President, but every action he has taken since taking his oath of office to the preserve, protect and defend our Constitution has been to shred our Constitution and divide our republic along every fault line within our society. Didn’t the Lying King say a politician’s family is off-limits from political attacks? Does this dictate include attacks from surrogates? Is this regime capable of acting in accordance to the dictates it imposes upon its ‘enemies?’ Prayerfully, we have less than seven months to endure the divisive attacks from this radical confederacy. Hopefully, working women and stay-at-home working women will not be bullied into falling for this class envy pushed by the Lying King and his surrogates, and remember this attack when they vote in the General Election. United we stand; divided we fall. For the first time since January 20, 2009, let’s stand united, and may God deliver to us a true leader on November 6, 2012!