Custom Search
|
Now Mobile-Friendly |
| Home | RSS Feeds | CFP Store | Photo Gallery | Archives | About Us | Advertise | Subscribe | Letters | Submissions | Links |Facebook | Twitter | Gas Prices |
|
Custom Search
| ||
| Countdown until Obama leaves Office |
|
CommentsPage 1 of 23 pages 1 2 3 > Last › Greatscott, you also said:"... it looks like they do accuse both sides of being categorized as the Most Corrupt Congress Critters fairly evenly." The numbers of Republicans on the CREW list compared to the Democrats seems that more Republicans are on it than Democrats. But, considering the Left-leaning proclivity of people with such a questionable background, as I posted earlier, no wonder that they would be more alert to any fault on the Right and much less on the Left. Remember, they are Soros-funded...! And, I do not remember seeing Barney Fwank on that list. Did I miss it??? Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 03:30 PM | # Greatscott, you said: "OK, maybe the Democans are slightly more corrupt than the Republorats. At least the Republorats resign from public office when they are caught red handed violating eithical congress rules." Now, in the spirit of Barney Fwank and a few others, that's admittedly pretty much an honest statement. I'm surprised by the idea here in the queue, especially should it come from the Paulistas, but it is indeed welcome. Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 03:26 PM | # OK, I will admit I did not research CREW very thoroughly, guilty as charged. that said, it looks like they do accuse both sides of being categorized as the Most Corrupt Congress Critters fairly evenly. Either way you look at it, both parties are equally corrupt along with the state run news media. OK, maybe the Democans are slightly more corrupt than the Republorats. At least the Republorats resign from public office when they are caught red handed violating eithical congress rules. Posted by Greatscott on 01/09 at 03:20 PM | # CORRECTION: I said: ... but guess what they does for your vast array of credibility...! and should have said: ... but guess what THAT does for your vast array of credibility...! Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 03:18 PM | # tomservo — Ding-Ding! After I found a wikipedia link that says that CREW is questionable: CREW has been described by major media organizations, including the Washington Post and New York Times, as a liberal watchdog group and by others as Democratic-leaning, left-leaning and progressive. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Citizens_for_Responsibility_and_Ethics_in_Washington you find what you like on Wiki. Wikipedia depends on the honest of the submissions to be correct. Assuming that what you posted is correct, then weigh the evidence. Your hinting that a Conservative or person on the Right praised CREW is akin to John McCain posturing for Romney while he cited the times when Reagan and GHW Bush had a head-to-head during the run-up to the elections and then Reagan picked Bush as his running mate. No self-serving here, is there? There are no perfect candidates, are there? Oh, wait! I am betting you think that Ron Paul is perfect but guess what they does for your vast array of credibility...! Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 03:15 PM | # tom servom, your argument is not with me. I found that info/data on the Internet and, after seeing CREW's background and affiliation with Soros and the SEIU connection, that was enough for me. As for my distortion of facts (as relate to CREW???), you and many other Paulistas should be experts on distortion. Again, all you did was go to CREW and find what you liked. Check out the links I provided and other organizations that are not Left-Serving and let us know what you discover. If you do, then you would be a lot more honest. Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 01:59 PM | # Sorry but you are 100% incorrect. I pulled the text from the Wikipedia entry, its just part of the overwhelming amounts of information available that you're choosing to ignore while you try to distort the facts. Along with other gems like this. Hide Public perception In November 2010, Republican U. S. Senator Jim Inhofe (OK) called CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan a "great American" for her organization's work on earmark reform. [38] Posted by tomservo on 01/09 at 03:06 PM | # tom servom, your argument is not with me. I found that info/data on the Internet and, after seeing CREW's background and affiliation with Soros and the SEIU connection, that was enough for me. As for my distortion of facts (as relate to CREW???), you and many other Paulistas should be experts on distortion. Again, all you did was go to CREW and find what you liked. Check out the links I provided and other organizations that are not Left-Serving and let us know what you discover. If you do, then you would be a lot more honest. Posted by NoCrud on 01/09 at 02:59 PM | # They listed quite a few democrats but I guess its obvious nocrud has to warp everything to his extreme viewpoint while spamming massive amounts of posts trying to claim Paul supporters are the crazy ones. He's laughable at best. Either way you can bet the republicans on that list aren't the ones that can win over the all important Ind or dem voters and is more unelectable than they try and claim Paul is. CREW’s Most Corrupt" CREW has published seven annual reports since 2005 of the politicians that CREW identifies as the most corrupt members of Congress. The 2005 report included 11 Republicans and 2 Democrats; [4] the 2006 report included 17 Republicans and 3 Democrats; [5] the 2007 report included 18 Republicans and 4 Democrats; [6] ; the 2008 report included 17 Republicans and 7 Democrats; [7] the 2009 report included 7 Republicans and 8 Democrats; [8] the 2010 report included 16 Republicans and 10 Democrats; [9] the 2011 report included 10 Republicans and 4 Democrats. [10] Posted by tom servo on 01/09 at 02:54 PM | # Page 1 of 23 pages 1 2 3 > Last › The dangerous new ‘Paul-iticians’ of the Tea PartyPosted by Judi McLeod on Jan 8, 2012 at 08:30 AM
Ron Paul, Rand Paul
Incredibly, the Ron Paul/Rand Paul ‘Paul-iticians’ are even worse than the garden variety ones, who made going to Congress getting rich. The Big Question of January 2012 must surely be: Will the Tea Party deliver the United States of America back to Barack Hussein Obama courtesy of the vote splitting destined as fate if Congressman Ron Paul, who fancies himself as the ‘Father of the TEA Party’, runs Third Party? More...Post a Comment on: The dangerous new ‘Paul-iticians’ of the Tea PartyNext entry: Barack Machiavelli Previous entry: Democrats have selective memory Note from the Editor: This section is for comments from readers of canadafreepress.com. Please don't assume that Canada Free Press agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege. |
|
Just at the very moment when a beleaguered America needs it least, the Tea Party Movement is serving up ‘Paul-iticians’ with what many thought were merely crumpets.
