It can now be reported that Nancy Champion Lanza, the mother of the alleged Connecticut shooter, Adam Lanza, was a CIA P2 analyst working for the Defense Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and also for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
DARPA specializes in the use of simulated video internet games for the purpose of mind control and staging psyops..
Sound familiar? The father of the boy in the Columbine murders was also in psyops.
Posted by JohnMinn on 01/13 at 12:05 AM | #
not surprisingly, the petitions from the states to secede from the federal gov was denied and they sited the constitution as meaning we need to be "united"... funny hiw the constitution comes in handy for them when the want it to...
Posted by Nina in MA on 01/12 at 05:57 PM | #
Adam Lanza's mom worked for the CIA on mind control video games:
Also, DHS started buying up and warehousing millions of bullets months before Sandy Hook, even before the theater massacre in Aurora.
Posted by Sheryl on 01/12 at 05:42 PM | #
I am a guy who knows what his birthright is, someone who knows the difference between superior law and color of law. When federal goons come swooping in to the towns and rural communities, it will be local armed militias, in tandem with loyal, legitimate Sheriff departments, that will intercede to repel the attack on our God-given freedoms. Should the tanks then be ordered to roll, civil war will be in effect and many more people will see the seriousness with which the American patriot holds his/her sovereignty and freedom. The issue of collectivism (centralized/cabal authority) vs. local self-governance will be up for grabs. The big cities, where the paid charges and bureaucracies are concentrated, will be hit the hardest by the engineered collapse to come. Whether this is triggered by some false flag attack or some formal WWIII scenario or economic collapse, the result will be massive destabilization, and some increased level of martial law being declared. This of course facilitates the "emergency dictatorship" option so that executive degrees now override congress in all things. The feckless, television controlled masses will pour out into countryside where the real wealth of the nation resides -- in the land, the wildernesses, and the farming countryside, where people maintain freezers filled with meat and root cellers filled with vegetables, and the hills are filled with livestock. The country folk will have their guns, the city folk won't, because they have been conditioned not to. Some will see the light of what has been done to them by "liberal" Big Government collectivists, some will not, for their entire socialist worldview has been hammered into them for so long they are essentially fed-run zombies. From this a republic will rise again, because the oathkeepers in the military will now make their presence felt. Citizen arrests coupled with military arrests of traitors will commence, traitors who will be tried and convicted by local courts.
It's a shame it should have to come to this, but this is the price or debt that must be paid, in order for Americans to retain their freedom their economic prosperity, and sovereignty. The founding fathers warned us about everything that has befallen us. They were damn serious about it, too; but did we listen? YES!
Posted by camababy on 01/12 at 03:53 AM | #
The treasonous but very childish and spoiled tax paid government employees of We The People from our three branches of government on down, are throwing temper tantrums about enforcing We The People’s U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment for which they all swore a solemn oath to serve and protect therefore subjecting We The People to unconstitutional acts of aggression and treason!!!
We The People…We Need To Talk!
Our Constitution is in danger and needs us!
Posted by NUTN2SAY on 01/11 at 12:06 PM | #
The public is being played as a bunch of suckers. The government and press are trying to make us feel guilty about our constitutional rights. They did it with Benghazi. After the attack, we were looking to persecute the director of the Youtube video for being too insensitive and causing the death of 4 Americans. It's all a diversion. They're trying to strip us of our constitutional rights and make us feel guilty for not freely giving them up. They're going to push us to the point where the majority of the population is going to support the idea of giving away freedom in return for so called security. They did it with 9/11/01. After the event, the government increased surveillance on its citizens in the name of national security and no one complained. It was welcomed. And that was done under a republican president (it's no longer a GOP vs. DEMS issue as they all serve the same agenda). Now with the shootings, the government is making us feel guilty because our gun control laws are too relaxed. They're going to stage more shootings and more people will die until the general public is demanding that the government take away our guns. Then we will have lost. Obama's first term looks great compared to what he is about to do over the next 4 years. In the Bible, there were no more than 44 Kings. Obama is our 44th president. Will there be a 45th?
Posted by Kage on 01/11 at 11:34 AM | #
Great article as usual Doug. Thank you for being a Watchman on the wall. The key to all the talk of gun banning is BABY STEPS! Most Americans really do not believe the Gov. will actually confiscate our firearms and the government lackeys wants to promote that idea. When the so-called “assault rifle” ban goes into effect another massacre will take place and they will come again and say “we didn’t go far enough, we need to put a plan in place for citizens to turn in their weapons” Then will come a “grace" period”. Then when we resist they will say “no more nice government. We need to confiscate all firearms for the '”good of law abiding citizens”. That is when the stuff will really hit the fan and we see who are the sheep an who are the patriot warriors.
Posted by Gun on 01/11 at 10:21 AM | #
I was listening to the radio last night and the host was talking about the shootings and gun laws and all the lefty libs who want more control over our guns..when he put on Gov Cuomo screaming about not needing 10 bullets to take down a deer. Well, the host started talking about the woman in GA who shot the intruder in her house, she was protecting herself and her 2 kids, she shot at this guy six times, hit him five and he was still walking around. So, no, gov, apparently GOOD hunters do not need 10 bullets to take down a deer but sometimes, a law abiding citizen protecting his family needs more than 6 to take out a criminal! What if he had a partner? What if he had somehow been able to reach her or one of her kids? Does she not have a right to protect her kids? Does she not have a right to those 10 bullets Governor?
Posted by Nina in MA on 01/11 at 09:29 AM | #
It’s about more than guns
Posted by Doug Hagmann on Jan 11, 2013 at 09:11 AM
The war we face is not just about guns. It's about our survival as a nation, fate of our children, grandchildren. Which side of history will you be on?
The warning signs of a tyrannical takeover of our Constitutional Republic have been flashing red for some time now and are now reaching a fever pitch. Despite the flashing signs, the clamor of the alarms and the cries of the watchmen, most Americans of this era remain in denial or have been rendered intellectually catatonic by busily chasing immediate gratification in the form of the newest version of the iPhone, iPad, or whatever “i” device will satisfy their ADHD addled intellect.More...
Post a Comment on: It’s about more than guns
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Next entries comments: Who are they and under whose authority?
Previous entries comments: Sheriffs CAN Block Federal Gun Control
Note from the Editor:
This section is for comments from readers of canadafreepress.com.
Please don't assume that Canada Free Press agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand.
Most Shared CFP stories
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2014 the individual authors.
Site Copyright 1997-2014 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement
Powered by ExpressionEngine