|
|
|
| |
|
CommentsThe real intent of the ethanol mandate is compliance with the goals of the UN's Agenda 21. The primary goal as stated by Agenda 21 is "sustainable development", however it's all a diversion and a lie.In order to achieve "sustainability", the holy grail of the globalists and progressives, the first thing they need to do is reduce the world's population down to roughly 500 million. Since we're currently approaching a population of 7 billion, that means that more than 6 billion of us have to go. But how can they achieve that? One of the "acceptable" techniques to depopulate the earth to these maniacs is starvation. Rising food prices, especially for the world's poorest people, means more death by starvation. This works hand in hand with their other big lie, man-made global warming. Unbeknownst to most people, the earth is moving into what promises to be an extended cooling period. When the climate cools down, crops don't grow as well, and this leads to even more famine and misery. The warming, which was completely natural, ended in 1998. It's all part of the elite's plan for the 21st Century, courtesy of Maurice Strong, George Soros, Obama, Al Gore, & Prince Charles... carbon profiteers all. The globalists are out to destroy the dollar so they can institute a global currency which they can control. Their next step is a single world government, once again, which they control. These people are just the latest in a long historical procession of sociopaths who want to rule the world. Hopefully the public will awaken before it's too late. fs Posted by F. Swemson on 01/17 at 04:40 AM | # Now if they will end the sugar subsidy..... high corn prices are causing high meat prices in the store. Posted by Spense on 01/15 at 08:00 PM | # Ending corn ethanol supportPosted by Institute for Energy Research on Jan 13, 2012 at 11:27 PM
This Was Never About Encouraging Ethanol Use, Naked payoff to American corn growers A USAToday story on the expiration of federal government support of domestic corn ethanol demonstrates the media’s ability to shape a story while appearing to be objective. The reporter technically includes both sides of the story, but trumpets one side so that the average reader would be outraged at the policy change. In reality, federal government support for ethanol is an inefficient attempt at central planning of markets that spawned some terrible consequences. More...Post a Comment on: Ending corn ethanol supportCommenting is not available in this channel entry. Next entries comments: CBS Exposes Obama’s Version of Venture Capitalism Previous entries comments: MSNBC The Cable Network of the Left Note from the Editor: This section is for comments from readers of canadafreepress.com. Please don't assume that Canada Free Press agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege. |
|
