Posted by Elaine on 01/30 at 09:01 PM | #
LizMN, Rep. West's comment about getting Democrat leaders and Obama out of the USA must be a good on if you take the Leftoids degree of hatred for him on this one issue only. The comments are particularly acidic and it is easy to determine who liked what West said and the others who think it is a threat to them. Thanks for providing the link.
Posted by NoCrud on 01/30 at 01:32 PM | #
No Crud -- Thank you for your comments. We all have a lot to think about for this important election.
I like Rep. Allen West's message to Obama and the Democrats:
Posted by LizMN on 01/29 at 11:27 PM | #
LizMN, you make a lot of sense. Cannot argue with it. But when you hear someone say that he/she "voted for the lesser of evils," then you can bet the farm that it was either a Democrat or someone who is more in line with Democrats that need be.
Democrats, by their snide remarks, are falling in line with what Dr. Schwarz said in his book "You can trust the Communists (to do exactly what they say). In that book, he said the Russians love to whip up carefully crafted sayings and fire them at US because of Americans love for a catchy phrase that brings on a smile. This and other good things on this line can be seen at:
They loved to turn our own psychology against us. To them, it was a grand joke to see us go exactly where they wanted us to go.
As for many of those on the CFR, I believe many of them are there because they want to be "in the know" and merely believe it is the smart thing to do—business wise... However, they often do not realize that being in a global community is just like allowing the UN to dictate to us on matters of the military: we are relinquishing control to others and that should not be. There will come a day when the UN will be so encouraged by this that they will tell us we cannot do militarily what is in our best interest and not that of the world at large. In fact, for GHW Bush to present going into Kuwait to the UN allowed Iraq to move much of their military material to Syria, and according to some Iraqi who came to our side, this included some of that weaponry that the Left uses to say we did not fine Weapons of Massive Warfare (ignoring shiploads of Yellow Cake that was indeed found and taken to Canada).
Most people in America do not understand the negatives of the CFR, Bilderbergers, etc., and it is incumbent on Conservatives to inform and educate them in these matters because we all know the Left/Media will not do it.
And you are exactly right, LizMN, when you say: "I will, however, vote for whichever one is the GOP candidate as a vote to defeat Obama. I see it as a vote for our nation." Otherwise, it is a vote for Obama...
Posted by NoCrud on 01/29 at 09:02 PM | #
Always keep in mind that both Romney and Gingrich are members of the Counsel on Foreign Relations. I've seen their names on the membership list. That tells us that both of them are globalists and are unlikely to take all the actions that we want, so do not set yourself up for a big disappointment.
I think Gingrich has more ability to communicate with us, and that's something that has been missing since Reagan left.
I will, however, vote for whichever one is the GOP candidate as a vote to defeat Obama. I see it as a vote for our nation.
Posted by LizMN on 01/29 at 07:53 PM | #
@Jean I am 100% agreement with you. "NO ONE" and I mean "NO ONE" knows what goes on behind closed doors; nor is it our business.
They are pushing Romney up where the sun doesn't shine on us just like they pushed Obama...and look at the mess we're in! I know I was stupid -- but I thought the FBI did background searches on all the Candidates. When I did a Google search on "Who does the background checks" -- IT IS THE MEDIA who is "supposed" to inform us!! Looks like the safety of who gets into office is all up to us!
Posted by Elaine on 01/29 at 01:23 PM | #
@Aaron You described Newt this way: "not gracious in his response...wrongness of his actions...past indescretions...show some humility." You don't know what went on in that household and so many lies about all of this have been embellished and passed on. Newt's response was measured, well stated, and in proper order. And, it did make those in the viewing audience stand up and take notice of the so-called elite news media's attempt to destroy yet another GOP contender.
The self-appointed elite media of the liberal left supports the agenda of the radical Marxist/communists who are out to destroy this nation. They sit on their perches delivering propaganda to whom they consider weak minded. It is long past time for truth.
Posted by Jean on 01/29 at 11:15 AM | #
Liberals will always see something obviously good and try to find something bad in it.
They will also see something obviously bad and see something good in it.
They seem to think that only they can see, understand and evaluate what is obvious to most thinking people. This is pure, unadulterated narcissistic thinking in the Liberal. However, since this is all they can see, that's all they have.
As for me, seeing how Newt dumped on King at CNN's Rebate, I really do not care if there was some political planning and strategy on Newt's part in being prepared for King's stupidity, I'll take it! It was apropos and went straight to the heart of Media skulduggery. Given the opportunity, any one of those on that panel would have done the same if it furthered their political standing since, everyone must admit, they are all in full political mode and there are no priests, popes or angels in politics but there can be truth in politics and we saw an example of it when Newt looked at King and used him as a representative of the Mainstream Media and showed him up for a modern-day, sophisticated, Liberal idiot. This was the best part of the debate.
The Media, represented by King, was all thinking that asking that question was their way of proving they are indeed journalists and not willing to allow anyone to "get away with it" in one form or another. And they still try to justify their mindset as they sit around and "interview" each other and rationalize that they were "just doing their job." But, are they really doing their job by allowing Democrats, and especially Obama, "get away with it" by allowing their political brothers to never, no never be questioned in what are really important matters? I suspect that this is a question that they'd see inappropriate and non-applicable.
Once you really know how Liberals and the MSM think, which are one and the same, then no one would want to take them to a dogfight. No need — they'd already be there.
Final thought? Yay, Newt!!!
Posted by NoCrud on 01/23 at 01:37 PM | #
Media Attempt to Pick-Off All GOP Candidates, One-by-One is Undemocratic & Hypocritical
Posted by Kelly OConnell on Jan 24, 2012 at 10:18 AM
Notion Only Conservative Candidates Will be Held Morally Accountable is National Suicide
America is learning the perpetually painful lesson of a rampant Marxist media. Consider the three rings of the socialist travesty. Essential issues are boiled down by leftist “journalists” to infant pap. Meanwhile, answers to compelling problems are slanted in favor of big government solutions. Finally, Conservatives are then perpetually pilloried for daring to hold and express irreversible convictions. This perilous scenario was no more patently on display than in the Jan. 19th SC Presidential debate. Fraudulent statist minion John “Bille Jean” King made the egregious error of pretending a political debate was best begun by demanding a candidate answer a question on “open marriage.” After receiving both barrels in repeated broadsides from a livid New Gingrich, the anti-media beat-down received a standing ovation.More...
Post a Comment on: Media Attempt to Pick-Off All GOP Candidates, One-by-One is Undemocratic & Hypocritical
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Next entries comments: There’s Something About Mitt
Previous entries comments: Media: Third-Party Rule Challenged
Note from the Editor:
This section is for comments from readers of canadafreepress.com.
Please don't assume that Canada Free Press agrees with or endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand.