Custom Search
Countdown until Obama leaves Office

press release distribution - Distribute Press Releases to Journalists at Newspapers, Magazines, TV and Radio.
Tattoo - we are a group of tattoo enthusiasts
Suboxone - private, comfortable detox from painkillers, heroin, methadone and other opiates using suboxone without the need for hospitalization or drug rehab.
Cash Advance - Find and compare cash advance and payday loan lenders. Free interest rates comparisons are available from the leading personal loan companies.
Alcohol Detox - Alcohol detox and drug detox programs in Florida by Sunrise Detox Center.
addiction treatment - addiction treatment center resource and referral public benefit service and directory of addiction treatment centers
Drug Rehab - Drug rehab and drug rehabilitation resources and information provided for the public benefit by About Drug Rehab.
payday loans - Payday loans are a great way to obtain emergency cash during financial hardship.








Print friendly | E-mail a friend | Contact Us

Media / Media Bias

Surprised the CBC didn't think of this

By Arthur Weinreb

Friday, April 29, 2005

It turned out that three people who heckled a campaign speech given by British Conservative Party leader Michael Howard were planted by the British Broadcasting Corporation. They were equipped with microphones and were discovered when some of Howard’s people noticed that BBC cameras were trained on the hecklers and not on the Tory leader. The hecklers yelled such things as "Michael Howard is a liar" and "You can’t trust the Tories" while the cameras rolled and the microphones made sure that they were audible.

The BBC admitted its actions, but not surprisingly defended what it did. Reminiscent of the "I was only doing research" defense that many people use to rationalize the downloading of child pornography, the BBC justified the stunt by saying that the network was producing a program on the history of heckling. The program, entitled "The Heckler", appeared on BBC Three last Monday evening.

The BBC, sometimes referred to as the Blair Bootlicking Corporation, said that they "observed" meetings and speeches of both the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties in producing the program. However, they appeared to have singled the Conservatives out as far as recording the hecklers yelling that the party and its leader were all liars and dishonest.

In defending itself, the BBC said what you would expect them to say; that they simply provided the microphones to the hecklers so that they could be recorded. The corporation in no way sees this as an encouragement for those people to heckle the Conservative leader, more than they might otherwise have done.

The head of BBC’s current affairs, Peter Horrocks, was quoted as saying that the heckling had been "light hearted" and the comments were "mild" and "jocular". It’s hard to see how calling someone a liar can be "jocular" — it must be a British thing.

Besides showing an obvious bias against the Conservative Party, this is another illustration of how the media, in its exuberance to make its own opinions known, crosses the line between reporting news and making news. The BBC is consistently denying that what it did affected how the three hecklers that were provided microphones acted. Clearly the hecklers must have realized that they were the centre of the BBC’s attention; not Michael Howard, and acted accordingly.

This makes the BBC’s habit of stacking town hall meetings with Liberal friendly people look like child’s play.


Arthur Weinreb is an author, columnist and Associate Editor of Canada Free Press. His work has appeared on Newsmax.com, Men's News Daily, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, Glenn Beck and The Rant. Arthur can be reached at: aweinreb@rogers.com

Homes in Costa Rica
CFP Speakers Bureau
Gold
combat




Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2009 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement