With the publication of the location, security details, and the local topography surrounding Mr. Rumsfeld's home in Maryland in its June 30th Escape section on second homes, as well as similar information on that of Mr. Cheney, in the thinly held guise of public interest, a vaporous veil if there ever was one, the New York Times has seemingly retaliated for being called to task for its incessant hobbling of the war on terror through its repeated release of classified programs over the objections of the Bush administration.
This information, which includes color photos of Mr. Rumsfeld's house, driveway, and roadside birdhouse, could serve no other purpose than to alert both the wandering traveler in need of immediate succor and a quick photo opportunity with the Secretary of Defense or, of course, your wandering terrorist, who might also need to get his bearings as he or she — to keep the Times happy in the unisex end of things — cruised the bucolic countryside in search of high level prey.
Battles of note have interesting names.
We have Monmouth, Thermopylae, Leipzig, Yorktown, Stalingrad, Midway, Waterloo, Tannenberg, The Little Big Horn, Ypres, New Orleans, Chapultepec, 73 Easting, and so on.
Today it's time to add 43rd Street to that list and the name of arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. to the sorry list of willing collaborators like Tokyo Rose, Lord Haw-Haw, and Hanoi Jane.
We have also heard some notable war cries over the years, with "54-40 or Fight!," "Remember Pearl Harbor," or "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead," and, "Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!" woven into our history. None of which would be worthy enough to appear in the Times of today.
Isaac Newton explained that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Right now, with our troops fighting and dying across the length and breadth of Iraq in Ramadi, through the Triangle of Death, in Fallujah, in the Green Zone, in Baghdad, we are also fighting as grave a conflict on the home front, where our secrets are routinely and openly betrayed and published, and our sworn enemies routinely find aid and comfort in the pages of the Gray Lady and her allies.
The wages of this conflict will be death, not if, but when. and those killed at home may number you and me, mom and dad, and the kids playing out front with the dogs, because we cannot go on giving our secrets to the enemy, passing off our leaders' summer homes in the travel section as some sort of vacation sight seeing side-light and a how do you do, without incurring a horrible loss sometime soon.
There is a right, granted in our Constitution, for a free and open press — a press designed to provide the people with news free from governmental control. The founders, however, probably had no idea that craven poltroons like Mr. Sulzberger and his slinking progressive minions, would put our premier operational secrets on the market, anymore than they could imagine that the papers of their time would print the sailing times, the ship's and captain's names, and orders for the task forces sent to quell the Barbary Pirates and raze Tripoli, and then transmit them directly to Tripolitania.
But when Mr. Sulzberger begins to print information vital to the success of our enemies, after entreaties to the contrary, he has gone too far.
and later, in a fit of pique, following a dressing down by Mr. Cheney, when Mr. Sulzberger publishes information on the private domiciles of our national leaders, including Mr. Cheney's, in a time of war, including critical neighborhood detail, he has stepped beyond the bounds of mere civility and common decency, let alone the public interest, and has openly behaved in a way which clearly illustrates his allegiance to those who are bent on the destruction of this nation, its ideals and its people, just as it finally puts to rest his claims to possess any semblance of a liberal calling.
Mr. Sulzberger's past actions, in the exposure of the NSa program and the Swift banking program, in addition to the continuous drumbeat of its gross anti-war sentiments and in the spiteful fictional accounts of perfidy he has attached to the Bush administration — such as the outlandish adam Liptak story, written during John Robert's confirmation circus, which attributed the authorship of the scurrilous Protocols of the Elders of Zion to Mr. Roberts while he was working in the Reagan White House as a lawyer — serve to brand the paper and its publisher very clearly. You know, those small errors of fact, written with every thought of maligning someone's character, which routinely march into the daily grist at that giant puffing progressive steel mill.
It is, after all, just fine to be a liberal mouthpiece, papers have been willing tools and dupes for many years. But it is quite another to step beyond the safe harbors of sychophancy into the heady waters of willing criminal enemy agency.
Perhaps, at long last, it's time to drop the lily white gloves and join the fray with the variegated tools employed so handily by the Clintons in their wars against domestic dissent, bimbo eruptions and any evidence of an unkind press — the attorney General, the IRS, the FBI, the INS, arcane federal statutes, private investigators, other newspapers, favored politicos, the war room, James Carville, and finally, personal destruction — you know, all the things that are absent from the field in our current campaign against the treasonous Times.
Clinton may have been chuckled at for his war hero status, but it was no laughing matter when you were in the crosshairs of his demolition crew after running afoul of him or his rancorous mate for an off-hand comment or a snide public remark.
It's high time to take off the gloves and smash the Times. They are, after all, bent on our destruction and have, as much, finally said so.
Mr. Pinch Sulzberger is just another Vidkun Quisling in pin stripes, free of any meaningful hindrances, operating for al-Qaeda rather than for the Nazis.
and Quislings continue on their destructive path until they are stopped.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement