The left-wing Citizens for Global Solutions, which believes in global government under the auspices of the United Nations, gave Senator Hillary Clinton an a+ in its most recent scoring of her voting record on issues near and dear to their globalist agenda. Hillary has improved her grade each year in the Senate, now eclipsing even "global test" John Kerry.
(www.globalsolutions.org/hill/reportcard/grades.asp?action=aplus)
according to the website of its New England branch, "Citizens for Global Solutions believe that nation states today must do what 13 american ex-colonies did in the 1780s when they discovered that they couldn't afford to be independent sovereignties: extend government to a new level and become cooperative partners under limited "federal" law." In other words, national sovereignty must give way to global government. The International Criminal Court, which would subject our soldiers to kangaroo trials without a jury, is one of Citizens for Global Solutions' pet causes.
This global government booster club would very likely have a direct pipeline into Hillary Clinton's White House, considering that its chief executive officer, Charles J. Brown, served in her husband's administration and represented it in negotiating the establishment of the International Criminal Court. Moreover, Simon Weber, its Legislative Coordinator, spent several months in the office of Senator Clinton.
although Hillary has been trying to demonstrate her Commander-in-Chief bona fides with her position on Iraq and expressions of toughness on Iran, she is a globalist at heart. In a 2005 speech at the Munich Conference on Security Policy, Senator Clinton linked our national security with a strong United Nations, saying :"My first observation is simple but it must govern all that we do: The United Nations is an indispensable organization to all of us - despite its flaws and inefficiencies." Was she, by chance, in a deep sleep during the oil-for-food scandal, not to mention the paralysis of the Security Council in dealing with Iraq, Iran and most other grave crises? Does she not realize that the United Nations cannot be reformed or serve a useful role in securing peace and security or human rights so long as the General assembly is dominated by non-democratic countries who free ride on our contributions to this dysfunctional organization? No matter, she tells us. She still wants a stronger UN, although assuring us all the while that any notion that the United Nations is moving towards the goal of "world government" goal is "ill informed."
Hillary is no fool. She spins a good yarn about how we should cooperate multilaterally through the United Nations, while deceiving us about the erosion of our national sovereignty that is certain to follow. That is because she wants to use the United Nations to tame america's power while taking its riches to support her idea of the global village. She believes that the UN is, in her words, "far too weak" and has voted to raise the U.S. assessments for peacekeeping forces above the current 25% of total contributions. Her a+ grade from the Citizens for Global Solutions is well-earned.
Even after 9/11, protecting our nation's security against another terrorist attack was not on the top of Hillary Clinton's list of priorities. Instead, she has aligned herself with the ‘blame america first' crowd:
In much of the world, the U.S. is seen as selfish, aggrandizing ourselves and leaving the rest out in the cold. The U.S. needs to take up more challenges on the global stage in eradicating disease, preventing environmental degradation and advancing women's rights. These must be the priorities of hegemony.
http://www.digitalnpq.org/global_services/global%20viewpoint/03-04-02.html
In helping to achieve her global village philosophy, Hillary supports the UN Millennium Project whose director is Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University professor and Special advisor to Kofi annan. Sachs released a report last year recommending strategies to achieve the UN's Millennium Development Goals within the next decade. Sachs' Millennium Project Report recommends a .7 % assessment against each developed country's Gross National Product, which would transfer nearly a trillion dollars of U.S. taxpayers' money to the UN administered development program over the next decade. Global taxes are part of Sachs' package. Sachs spins his wealth distribution program as an investment in the security of our country. Hillary buys into this approach as part of her "priorities of hegemony." Like Sachs, Hillary opposes the Bush tax cuts as a windfall for the rich and wants to use that money instead to pay for her wealth redistribution agenda. She was quoted by the associated Press as telling a fundraising audience in San Francisco during the 2004 presidential campaign: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good".
Hillary and Sachs have been on the lecture circuit together, and Sachs was also a featured speaker at the Clinton Global Initiative last fall. We can expect Jeffrey Sachs to play an important role in any new Clinton administration.
Remember when Bill Clinton as President told us that, with Hillary as First Lady, we would be getting two for the price of one? That is still true, only in reverse if Hillary becomes the next President. as the possible future First Husband said in discussing what he called the "global community": "We americans have not always done our part in [the UN], but it is all we have." Hillary believes so much in this globalist philosophy that she may decide to appoint Bill as her personal roving envoy to the world.
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement