Consider Barack Obama's lament that the Constitution does not offer "positive rights" delineating what government must do for the citizenry; Breast feeding as a right
Time Magazine has caused a stir with a rather risqué picture of a pretty model breastfeeding her three year old son, and the internet has been abuzz with commentary, much of it directed at the picture - and its appropriateness - itself. What has been missing is a discussion of the actual article the picture was intended to promote, and why Time felt it worthy of devoting the cover to an article about extended breastfeeding. One must ask; is there more to this than meets the eye?
